Through Ending a Harsh Tory Social Experiment, This Budget Clearly Sets Out How Labour Will Wage the Struggle to Renew Britain

Just recently, the finance minister, Rachel Reeves, delivered a Labour economic plan. People have been asking for Labour’s purpose and values to be more clearly expressed. Through the decisions made – a shift to a fairer tax system, targeting wealth to pay for tackling child poverty, good public services and the cost of living – we have unequivocally set out what we believe in.

That’s why Labour MPs cheered in the Commons, and it’s why we are ready for the battles to come. And it’s why the cries from the conservative side began right away.

The Main Dividing Line in British Politics

The central dividing line in British politics is yet again on the economy. On the one side Labour, who aim to change it so it benefits everyday working people, and on the other, our political opponents, who favor the status quo and the failed doctrine of the past. We must now confront, and prevail in, the argument.

The Tories were given 14 years to resolve things and instead, by any measure, they got much worse. Their doctrinaire austerity and trickle-down economics – tax cuts for the wealthy, cutting off investment (leaving us with low productivity and wages), and failing to support young people post-Covid – proved ineffective.

Record of Failure Under the Previous Government

Living standards fell by the largest margin since records began, child poverty reached record levels, NHS waiting lists in England were the highest on record, wages were stagnant, a housing crisis became entrenched, young people scarred by Covid were abandoned. The record of failure goes on.

One budget alone can’t put all this right, so Labour has a long-term plan for rebuilding and for restructuring the country. And we have to go out and keep making the case for why our strategy will reap dividends.

Social Security and Youth Deprivation

During the Tories, welfare spending rose substantially. As did child poverty, because they didn’t address the root causes: low pay, high housing costs, significant inequalities in education, health and regions. The state ends up paying more to deal with the symptoms instead of the cure.

That’s why we are building more affordable homes than for a generation, increasing wages and new rights for workers, greatly increasing investment in infrastructure and new industries, reducing waiting lists down and lowering the costs of childcare and energy as we pursue clean power.

Ending the Two-Child Benefit Cap

This is also the reason we are absolutely right to use this budget to remove the two-child benefit cap.

For eight long years, since it was enacted, low-income families with children have endured from a cruel social experiment that was branded as fair for working people when it was the opposite. Most of the families affected by it have a parent in work.

It’s done nothing but push 300,000 more children into poverty – which, ultimately, costs us more, as well as being callous and immoral.

Tangible Effects in Local Areas

From experience from my own district – where over 5,000 children will be lifted out of poverty as a result of ending the cap – the real impact it’s had. Children wearing £1 wellies as school shoes, children going to bed without food and cold, living in overcrowded, damp homes, parents during the holidays depending on food banks for a modest meal or small gift for their kids.

I also see the impact on schools, teachers, social workers, doctors and charities who are already stretched but have to divert time and resources to supporting children who are living with the consequences of severe deprivation.

Lasting Effects of Child Poverty

Just one in four pupils from the poorest families achieve five good GCSEs, compared with nearly three in four among affluent families. This predisposes them for the disadvantages they face during their lives: missed potential, financial struggles and poor health. Children who grew up in poverty are more likely to be unemployed or poor as adults.

Addressing child poverty isn’t just a moral imperative, it is a future-oriented strategy. Poverty costs the economy significantly more than the £3bn cost of removing the two-child cap, or expanding free school meals.

That’s why we acted promptly in the budget, despite the very difficult economic context. Every day with this cap in place sees more than 100 extra children pushed into poverty. The effects of lifting it will not occur overnight either, so taking early action in the parliament was crucial.

The cap was a totem to 14 years of unsuccessful rightwing ideology. Now it is abolished.

Equitable Funding for Policies

We, as Labour, can also be explicit that these measures are being funded in a fair way – from a new gaming tax, closing tax loopholes and a new “mansion tax”.

Conclusion

Equity and direction – that’s how we will succeed in the contest of ideas. This budget is a clear statement that we won the election as Labour, and will govern as Labour. As I consistently said during my campaign to become deputy leader, we must reclaim the political platform and define the narrative more strongly about what’s really wrong with the country and how we are fixing it. We’ve definitely done that this week.

So let’s maintain it and win this fight about how we will renew Britain and tackle the entrenched inequalities holding us back.

Donald Hutchinson
Donald Hutchinson

A seasoned streamer and digital content creator with over a decade of experience in building online communities.