🔗 Share this article

Deductibles. Preferred providers. Out-of-network. Premium health services. Out-of-pocket expenses. Fixed payment. Shared insurance. Insurance consultants. Insurance brokers. Healthcare consultants. Affordable Care Act. Health Maintenance Organization. Preferred Provider Organization. Exclusive Provider Organization. POS. High Deductible Health Plan. Health Savings Account. Flexible Spending Account. Health Reimbursement Arrangement. EOB. COBRA. Small Business Health Options Program. Single coverage. Dependent coverage. Insurance subsidies.

Confused? It's understandable. Who comprehends this complex system? Not the typical entrepreneur. Nor the typical worker. Choosing the appropriate medical coverage for our business – or for households – seems like it requires a PhD in healthcare.

The Medical System Isn't Just Complicated, It Is Costly

Based on recent research, typical households spends $twenty-seven thousand annually for their health insurance (up 6% compared to last year). Typical company healthcare expense is projected to exceed $seventeen thousand per employee by 2026, an increase of 9.5% compared to 2025.

Now federal operations has ceased functioning due to partisan disputes regarding subsidies which analysts predict will lead to a doubling of premiums for numerous US citizens.

When Will We Truly Examine Universal Healthcare?

How soon might we genuinely evaluate a national health insurance program here in America? I have to believe we're approaching that point since this can't continue.

I'm not suggesting government-run medicine. I'm advocating that our already existing Medicare system – an insurance system – simply expand to include all citizens. Our infrastructure doesn't change. The way medical professionals receive payment changes. Believe me, they will adjust.

The Way Universal Coverage Would Work

Universal healthcare coverage would require payments from both employees and employers. In comparable systems, a worker making average wages pays approximately five point three percent toward medical coverage. The company must contribute about 13.75%.

Does this seem expensive? Unless you contrast that with what average American pays. I know multiple clients who are easily contributing anywhere from 8% to 15% of their employee wages for medical benefits. And keep in mind that with inclusive programs, those payments also cover retirement benefits, sick pay, parental benefits and unemployment benefits along with funding healthcare facilities. When including those costs compared with our current spending for our retirement plans, unemployment insurance and vacation benefits, the difference decreases.

Execution in the US

In the US, a national health premium would increase existing Medicare taxes, a system already established. It should be income-adjusted – those at higher income levels would contribute higher amounts than lower-income earners. There would be both an employee and employer contribution. And, like many our government's military, IT, social programs and transportation services, the system should be outsourced by private contractors rather than federal agencies.

Benefits for Entrepreneurs

Universal healthcare coverage represents a significant advantage for small businesses such as my company. It would put small companies in equal competition with our larger competitors who can afford better plans. It would make management much easier (automatic payroll withholding remitted like retirement and healthcare taxes, instead of individual transactions to benefit firms and coverage administrators).

It would enable simpler for us to budget our yearly costs, instead of going through the complicated (and ineffective) theater of bargaining with the big insurance providers that we must do every year. Because it's simplified, there would be a better understanding about benefits among workers – contrasted with existing arrangements which require them to interpret the complications of current options. Additionally there would definitely exist reduced responsibility for employers since we wouldn't would be privy to our employees' medical records for risk assessment and different options.

Capitalist Perspective

I'm as capitalist as possible. However I recognize that government has a significant role in society, from providing defense to supporting essential systems. Ensuring medical coverage to all through a national insurance system enhances economic foundations. It's a better, easier system for small businesses which hire the majority of American employees and generate half of our GDP. It makes it possible employees to enjoy better health, come to work more often and be more productive.

Addressing Concerns

Are there numerous factors I'm not addressing? Of course there are. But with rising medical expenses experienced in recent years, it's clear that current healthcare legislation isn't functioning very well. I understand that America isn't a compact European nation where big changes are easier to implement. But expanding Medicare for all, even with increased taxation required, would remain a better and more affordable strategy for not only controlling healthcare costs and ensuring coverage for all citizens.

Time for Realistic Evaluation

As Americans, must reduce national pride. Our healthcare system isn't so great. The US places significantly behind many other countries with the best healthcare in the world, according to major studies. Maybe one bright spot in this current situation could be that we take a hard look in the mirror and acknowledge that big changes need to happen.